|
SUBJECT: DEQ File
No.97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County
Dear Mr. DeVries:
It has come to the
attention of the Department of Environmental Quality that there has been recent
unauthorized activity on the above referenced parcel of property.
You have been
certified as the legal landowner and/or contractor who
did the following unauthorized activity: Construction and maintenance of two
wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond. A permit must be
issued prior to the start of this type of activity.
A review of the
Department's files shows that no permits have been issued. Therefore, the Department has
determined that this activity is in violation of Part 301, Inland
Lakes
and Streams, of the Natural
Resource and
Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts
of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
The Department has
been informed that one or both of the dams
partially failed during a recent rain event, causing debris and flooding
at downstream
locations. We find that
dams of this nature are
inherently hazardous and cannot be permitted.
The
Department therefore orders
you to cease and desist all
activities at this location, and to restore
the stream to a free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming the dams from the stream
channel. All restoration work shall be
completed no later than January 31, 2003.
Please
notify this office when the restoration has been completed so
that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff. Failure to comply with this
request or any further unauthorized
activity on the site may result in this case being referred for elevated enforcement action.
We anticipate and would appreciate
your full cooperation in this
matter. Please feel free to contact me at this office if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
David L. Price
District Representative
Land and Water
Management Division
*****************************************************
This is the actual
response sent back:
Re:
DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N;
Dear Mr. Price,
Your certified letter dated 12/17/02
has been handed to me to respond to. I am the legal landowner but not
the Contractor at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan. A couple of
beavers are in the (State unauthorized) process of constructing and
maintaining
two wood "debris" dams across the outlet stream of my Spring Pond.
While I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise their dam
project, I think they would be highly offended that you call their
skillful use of nature's building materials "debris." I would like to
challenge your department to attempt to emulate their dam project
any time and/or any place you choose. I believe I can safely state
there is no way you could ever match their dam skills, their dam
resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence,
their
dam determination and/or
their dam work ethic.
As to your request, I do not think the
beavers are aware that they must first fill out a dam permit prior
to the start of this type of dam activity.
My first dam question to you is:
(1) Are you trying to discriminate
against my Spring Pond Beavers
or
(2) do you require all beavers
throughout this State to conform to
said
dam request?
If you are not discriminating against
these particular beavers through the Freedom of Information Act, I request completed
copies of all those other applicable beaver dam permits that have been issued. Perhaps we will see
if there really is a dam violationof Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource
an Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to
324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
I have several concerns. My first
concern is...aren't the beavers entitled to legal representation? The
Spring Pond Beavers are financially destitute and are unable
to
pay for said representation, so the State will have to provide them
with a dam lawyer. The Department's dam concern that either
one or both of the dams failed during a recent rain event causing
flooding is proof that this is a natural occurrence, which the
Department is required to protect. In other words, we should leave the
Spring
Pond Beavers alone, rather than harassing them and calling their
dam names.
If you want the stream "restored" to a
dam free-flow condition please contact the beavers, but if you are
going to arrest them, they obviously did not pay any attention to your dam
letter... they being unable to
read English.
In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond
Beavers have a right to build their unauthorized dams as long as the
sky is blue, the grass is green and water flows downstream. They have
more dam rights than I do to
live and enjoy Spring Pond. If the
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection lives up to
its name, it should protect the natural resources (Beavers) and the
environment (Beavers' Dams).
So, as far as the beavers and I are
concerned, this dam case can be referred for more elevated enforcement
action right now. Why wait until 1/31/2003? The Spring Pond
Beavers may be under the dam ice then and there will be no way for you
or your dam staff to contact/harass them then.
In conclusion, I would like to bring
to
your attention a real environmental quality (health) problem
in the area. It is the bears! Bears are actually defecating in
our woods. I definitely believe you should be prosecuting the defecating
bears and leave the beavers alone. If you are going to investigate
the beaver dam, watch your step! (The bears are not careful where
they dump!)
Being unable to comply with your dam
request, and being unable to contact you on your dam answering
machine, I am sending this response to your dam office.
Thank You,
Ryan DeVries & The Dam Beavers
***************************************************************************
VERY WITTY !
(This is copied
directly from an e-mail that has done 'the rounds'. Not sure if
it's true of course, but it makes a good story)
|